2
u/PikachuEXE Jan 25 '19
Same answer for PHP :)
3
1
u/shevy-ruby Jan 25 '19
Well - the "question" was linked in here at ruby though, not at PHP.
Might have been better to put it to php - that way our time here would not be wasted with non-questions and non-answers to these non-questions.
1
u/nikaone Jan 25 '19
The most effective site to a problem. I wish other sites can be like it , no crap.
1
1
-2
u/shevy-ruby Jan 25 '19
That someone is spending time to come up with something like that?
That is just weak click-baiting. I mean, there aren't even any arguments in pro or con to this - it's just a static page with a stalemate answer. The answer on the page is "No". It could easily be "Yes" or any other single-word AND IT WOULD BE ALL AS EQUALLY USELESS. It doesn't convey any new information to people either. There is no discussion with such blank non-questions and non-answers.
That is just wasting the time of everyone, so downvotes are deserved.
If you want to reason either way, at the least put some effort into what you write.
1
1
u/Morozzzko Jan 27 '19
All posts / websites / podcasts with arguments aren't much useful either.
I mean, people spend hours debating whether or not Ruby is dying. This website is quite the opposite. It just states a point and lets us move on.
Why all the anger?
1
14
u/drbrain Ruby Core Jan 25 '19
Yes. Please go away now and leave us alone