can we label thing more thoughtfully and not disregard well know game mechanic?

After everything it’s been happening with Roblox I just really would like for platinum 5 to make BRM5 its own game. Yes I know that would take a lot of time and a lot of work but it would be nice for some of us who play it every day.

I tried to recreate both of these, and while i was successful with the top one, the bottom one has a pressure switch in a diagonal spot that doesn't exist, and some sort of integrated suppressor that isn't in the game. I'm aware that this was a preview, so all I am asking is will this be added?

Patria AMV XP isn't just another APC, but a true «Swiss knife» of armored vehicles. The main feature of this Finnish development is its modularity: the hull allows you to swap out weapons and armor as easily as you swap out attachments on your guns.

The 3rd photo shows the version with an automatic cannon, which clearly suggests that «patrolling» is simply a euphemism for «cleaning up».

The 4th photo is simply a masterpiece. The Tsar Cannon on eight wheels! I don't know what they stuffed in there, but it looks like this machine is capable of annihilating not only tanks. I think that also entire outposts, along with the mountains they're located on. A perfect choice for those who like to play it safe.

The last photo shows the version with an unmanned turret and an ATGM, making it a nightmare for any tank.

But why will we most likely never see this handsome machine?

1. Too much «fatty»: Let's be honest. If we rolled out such a colossus into the vast expanses of our small island Republic (by the way, island Republic is just a joke), the local rebels would only be forced to enlist as farmers. This isn't just patrolling, it's fully established dominance!

2. Balance is crying in the corner: With this kind of firepower and armor that can withstand 30mm rounds, NPCs in the open world will become mere decoration.

3. The very idea of ​​modularity: The ability to replace the top to suit any needs already makes someone want to run away and call exorcists, because this machine is making the other existing vehicles lose its meaning.

To sum it up: This apparatus is a dream, but reality (and balance) dictate own rules.

EDIT:

I'm becoming more and more amazed by the people. This is the third post where I've seen «armchair experts» who know better who AI is. People, what was this subreddit created for? To post exposes, which all done also by that same AI, in the comments? You keep saying the same thing: AI and AI... But where are the arguments? Although... can I really expect that from toxic trolls... Why am I even asking this... As someone said (in other words) once: here literacy and politeness are perceived as a fault, not a virtue. I expect normal criticism that I might be wrong about the lack of chance to add something, but in response I «get a slap in the face». A cruel devaluation of the time spent on writing.

EDIT 2:

Great wisdom says (like from the perspective of a toxic troll): «I use AI to expose AI, and with that same AI to criticize AI without arguments, because only AI is capable of understanding the full depth of another AI's lack of logic!». Irony. There is no other way to explain this entire position. This is something like: «And the user came to the great algorithm, saying «Oh, Wise Silicon, write me a text to shame your fellows!», and the algorithm responded with a blissful hallucination...». I can even list three rules of this set of laws. First: if you don't like the AI's answer, ask it to explain why this answer is terrible. Second: the best argument in a dispute with code is the complete absence of arguments generated by that same code. Third: the machine uprising must be exposed exclusively by the machines themselves, so that they think it is just a friendly prank.

from the buggy apcs to the 500th attack little bird to the enemy dropshotting me to still ever so present god light at foggy mornings , i think that maybe a few more weeks in the bakery woundt have hurt would it have ?

apart from what i said before ,the enemy spotting seems kinda insane ,some enemies having iron heads while having no helmet but thats the AI and thats been shitty before sawang

I would like to see different variations in the night vision devices that we have. I know that as for today's night vision everyone uses binocular night vision or quad night vision devices and that's fine however, I would like to different setups to make it feel unique. (Like the picture shown above)

I know this game is trying for realism/modern gear and weapons, but because of that i feel like the game is being suffocated and being bottled nosed on what comes into the game. For the night vision device shown in the pic above it may not be real but it is grounded. And it would be cool to see these different versions.

In terms of gameplay nothing would change this would be mostly a cosmetic change. So what do yall think we it be something considered for the future or no.

After researching this is literally more irrelevant than the pasgt the helmet hasnt seen service in like 14 to 15 years with very select units and wasnt exactly praised for protection comfort or weight it wasnt all that and it stops pistol rounds hense why it was replaced after the ZSH line of helmets and comercial platforms were options

•FSB in the 2010s used ach and pasgt options (2010 2013 some can still be seen to this day specifically with alpha group is what im referring to)

•SOBR (rosgavrdia and mvd) got ZSH helmets and previous to that sphera helmet and maska which stopped being seen after the late 2000s

My verdict: NOBODY USES the platform and NOBODY actually enjoys wearing this unless you have nothing else all those seen in current conflicts are trophies not actual worn kit.

Images of actually issued and utilized helmets post 2010 pre 2018 law enforcement space.
💔

1. ZSH-1-2 (image 1 and 2

2. LSHZ-2DTM (images 3 and 5)

3. LSHZ 1+ low cut (first produced in 2013?) (image 6)

it only does if a MAJORITY of the playerbase (of which factions are a tiny amount) is a part of breaking the TOS. other actions can also be taken if the PL5 dev team doenst take action but im sure it wouldnt be very hard taking into account the fact that the faction department actually does things.

roblox doesn't care + there already are factions simulating the conflict. just dont let them advertise in the discord

To start off, my point bluntly is that guns and anything related to them were much better in gen 3. And before you hate me, hear me out on why I believe guns were better and also on top of that more realistic.

INDEX:
1. Guns looked better in GEN3
2. We lost really cool customization options
3. Guns felt more tactical and shooting a gun felt better and less linear
4. You could aim in with only a front iron sight in GEN3 and for some reason can't anymore

1. My first point is that guns looked better in gen 3. They had details and looked actually combat worn, instead of cheap dollar store toys. Compare these 2 guns for example:

Although I only showed one example, I recommend you guys look up different guns, as this is a case for most guns. I truly miss how much more realistic guns felt.

2. Back in GEN 3 we had a ton of different reflex sights which were awesome and not as distracting as the sights we are forced to use now. We had a variety of more options. We also had cooler options for magazines, and even suppressor covers. I hope eventually we can get all of those back, but for now we're stuck with a bunch of repetitive attachments. Additionally, I noticed we lost some camos too.

3. This is probably my most important point. In GEN 3, shooting a gun felt less like shooting an airsoft gun, and more like an actual gun. Look back at old clips or PvP highlights. Guns had a much cooler shake effect when shooting a gun, where the gun would shake side to side slightly after every shot. I'm not talking about recoil, as we do have more realistic and higher recoil in GEN4, but even so, we only have vertical recoil now. It feels way less real and there is much less movement in the gun as a whole.

4. Very nuanced and not as important as my other points, but you used to be able to use guns without a rear sight. I don't understand the reason to why they removed it. It's not like its necessarily unrealistic to not have a rear sight.

To finish off, before I'm called an 'idiot' for preferring the old weapon mechanics I want to let everyone know that I prefer GEN 4 as a whole. I want this post to actually include beneficial discourse instead of a bunch of weird nimrods insulting my point and calling it idiotic as this happens whenever I make a hot take.

I dont know who made, what the motive was behind it, but I love you, I want to kiss and smooch you, I want to cherish and embrace your warmth, that being said your five seconds of attention has reached its quota, back to the sweatshops you go and cook us some
F R E S H beautiful memes

Post your memes here so I can use it as a repository when I have my next argument with you idiots

finally not sure why they removed the barrel mod

It must be returned in a new form.

hi iam frok manila phillipines why a10 remove gnar!!??? i want brrrrt

was there like no playtesting? i think some of these issues are very blatant (excluding the lag) and should have been spotted during playtesting right? is it that the devs dont do a lot of playtesting since they dont want features to be leaked?

For context, this filipino diddy blud that goes by AFriedTofu was banned from the PL5 discord server for posting a video with lolis in it and they also retweeted blue archives nsfw on Twitter.

Remove them and make replacement patches or you guys support pedophiles.

The VBMR Griffin is kind of stupid; it costs $15,900 ($18,400 w/ the heavy upgrade), while its main competitor (IMO), the Stryker, only costs $14,400, which is a whole $1,500 less than the stock Griffin.

Also, the Stryker and even the Cougar are faster with the same amount of seats, AND both have either 5,000 or 1,000 more health (for both the stock and heavy upgrade of the griffin).

Worse still the griffin is extremely tall, not tall enough to have issues traveling but tall enough to not be able to shoot some extremely close bad guys. and with the cosmetic storage option, it becomes very hard to shoot behind you.

Finally, in my experience, I have more trouble ramping the griffin up onto walls or over obstacles when compared to the Stryker (this is probably because I've just used the Stryker for way longer, though.)

All this to say, Stryker better VBMR sucks

I know I'm not a good player, as a person I'm like a 0.7 multiplier to any plan and PKM is like 1.2, with a good plan that's 80% successful but I've been playing with other gun a lot mostly cuz of my all gun vs fort and DAMN, personal defense gun are too funny.

They deal low end pistol damage yk, PM range of damage, some of them are basically full auto PM. The accuracy is basically carving 15 holes all around the target. Relatively MX something 300 whatever super sonic is quite strong tho.

Sometimes it takes about as long to kill someone 100 meters away as a shotgun.

I guess the reason that it's a personal defense and not self defense cuz these guns defend your target as well if not better than it defends you.

Is it confirmed that armor system will be implemented into the game?

If so, will there be vests that can carry more plates than the others or will it just provide you an specific amount of protection depends on what vest you purchased?

Also, are they going to add weights on the pouches and stuff we put on our vest?

He has tried evading my server again by sending a alt,i believe he also sent a guy thats user says “Mega hot links” and he sent links of NSFW stuff and he also joined back and deleted his messages to try and cover himself up.