It's fucking nasty.

Two texture options, rubber or a fucking cracker. Or a mix.

Taste? would you like some pig with your salt?

If you put bacon on my burger I will hurt you. You are not doing me a favor, you are making an enemy. And don't even get me started on those "bacon" bits in a little shaker that fucking serial killers sprinkle onto salads.

Pork roast, seared ham slice, deli ham, honey glazed, pulled pork, bbq, ribs, all FANTASTIC. Fuck bacon and fuck everyone who likes it.

The only MILDLY redeemable quality is the grease collected afterwards. I will fry an egg in that.

Actually, I will cook your bacon, throw it into compost, and use the drippings to make you an actually good breakfast.

I will die on this hill.

I just found it, called Doing God's Work, on royalroad.com

You won't be disappointed.

Can someone make a list of all things heretic?

Fite me, worshipers of the Corpse-Emperor.

My bluetooth headphones are connected to 2 devices at the same time

There should he Crusader Dad memes on here

I do not feel, regardless of whether Kings are divine or not - and not at all times are they - that the authority of government is inherent and the idea that it is holy and important - governmental authority, is more sacrosanct than truly 'sanctus.' A government prone to tyranny loses its authority. A government in error is temporarily outside of authority which is truly divine as well.

Error in government is not always error in God - for no man perfectly obeys God, which is why we have ever believed in Sin. Those released from sin's power by Grace do not always find true knowledge, and the capacity of life is consistently assaulted by those seeking to protect only certain portions of it.

That a given person is given over to a particular virtue or vice may be self-evident - but if the government conflicts with virtue, or enforces heavy-handedly the same, is there not fairness in saying that authority itself has become vice?

Furthermore, the Bible is not inerrant, nor is it wise to treat it as such that one uses it as the sole informer of one's philosophy and theology. It is a very old book, and the insights of several men dominate it, chief amongst them, Saint Paul, who were he to live again today, would assuredly espouse a more moderate perspective. The Christian church actually is a bulwark of light, but only some of it is certain and desirable light in a universal sense - and this is the cross of all religion, where there is no such thing as perfection, for perfection is itself abstract, and its meeting with the concrete, quite often only to the sight of the beholder.

And a beholder can be just, and unsatisfied with that which he sees even though it is, for many intents and purposes, true and holy. Augustine could have no patronage were Paul to be taken literally at all times. Any many type of government can be just, including amongst them, those possessed of Western and nigh-Western ideas of liberty and personal freedom.

Who would win?