r/OpenChristian • • Dec 05 '24

Do not allow yourself satisfaction at the murder of the United healthcare ceo

0 Upvotes

I know we've all been hurt in some manner by this man. While it was a vague anger, a rumbling back thought, it was okay.

But now it has materialized into murder.It's no longer vague. It happened. Now examine your heart. Do we approve of this murder?

You cannot. Forgive him. This is what our Lord commands us. Do not fall for this stumbling block.

I have literally mused to myself having heard that a health insurance call center was attacked "that CEO is out there somewhere" and felt noble for thinking it. That was murder according to Jesus.

The sermon on the mount, Matthew 5.

[21] "You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder; and whoever murders will be liable to judgment.’ [22] But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable to the council; and whoever says, ‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire.


r/OpenChristian • • Nov 18 '25

I'm disappointed in this sub.

3 Upvotes

I made what I felt was a beautiful post. In that post I used the term "Judeo-Christian" incorrectly. Every single commenter hyperfixated on that and went after me for it, such that the content of my post was lost.

It sucks to be treated that way. Just thought you all should know.

I thought better of this sub.


r/OpenChristian • • Mar 24 '25

Discussion - General A bit of a hot take, but i think worth mentioning. We cannot just blindly ignore verses that don't line up cleanly or challenge our culture cause its easier.

0 Upvotes

TL;DR: Verses are there for a reason, ask yourself how does a conflicting statement measure up against the word of God/Jesus, and does it get int he way of loving God or others? We are missing out on a lot of deeper intimate knowledge by ignoring/dismissing hard bible verses.

So right off the bat i get subs like this tend to attract new comers to any hobby/interest or in this case belief structure, so grace where grace is due, and there is honestly no stupid question when it comes to navigating christianity. The problem is, the answers are not always black and white. Typically a lot of first time posters are posting "thoughts on secular music?" or "im not married and having sex" or "here are a few contradicting bible verses, how do i navigate?", and none of that is of concern. What is of concern is some of the responses and how comfortable some of you are with just blankly dismissing verses without challenging yourself/asking why it might still have validity.

Hear me out.

If something is in the bible, regardless if you come from the perspective of every word is divinely chosen by God/the holy spirit though humans OR if its a collection of works describing humans experience of God carefully curated by humans to best represent Gods true word/intent, its in there for a reason and we should approach each verse/story/statement as such. Now, today in our modern age we can and should approach many verses with more context through history, external texts, archaeology, social study and alike, so we can paint a fuller picture and better understand. BUT when reading the bible in order for a verse/statement/command to be true today, it needs to of been true when it happened, when it was written, and tomorrow. If we find conflicts in something, say LGTBQ+ with (general) Western society vs what the bible says, we cannot just dismiss those verses, and just using the excuse of "well the translation is bad, and back in the 70's when the modern translations were being done the rise of homophobic sentiments in the west contributed to the translations we have today" is kinda week, cause it then ignores what the verse(s) might ACTUALLY BE TRYING TO SAY. for the record i do think its a bad translation, has done a lot more damage than any other poor translation in the past. Side note, bad bible translations across different languages is a fun rabbit hole to go down.

"Okay, great. so how do you suggest we navigate these kind of scenarios?"

I'm happy you asked. My approach, and how my pastors have always done this, is to start with the fundamentally true statements of the bible, there are not many honestly but thats good. Almost every conflicting statement and hard question can be approached this way. What did Jesus say and if Jesus didn't mention it, what did God tell someone about it? Lastly how does it compare against the 2 golden rules of "love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind" and "love your neighbour as yourself" (Matthew 22:37-39) (or the 10 commandments if you prefer, but 2 is easier than 10). Jesus made very few hard statements about whats right and wrong but often did the opposite. He challenged what many people were saying was right/wrong, and said through a relationship with him we don't need to be so tied down with rules and nuance often gets in the way of the heart and good intentions.

Personally, I'm a traditional blue eyes, white, upper middle class, straight, married man. I couldn't get any more vanilla and if being gay turned out to be the single worse sin known to man (its not), it would literally never have an effect to me personally. But I'm an ally and without even arguing about bad translations, we can approach every "anti gay" verse as described above.

  • What did Jesus say?

    • honestly, not much. you could interpret he was dancing around the topic, but he wasn't much of a beating around the bush kind of guy, so lets go with "not much" or "nothing"

  • What did God say to people?

    • a few things, all largely old testament stuff that either we agree doesn't DIRECTLY apply to us like those in Leviticus (but we should still study and try to understand W H Y he would have said it then) and other verses are largely people referring to God's earlier commandments/mentions of being gay.

  • So how does being gay/ally stand up against the 2 golden rules?

    • Is your Gayness or advocacy getting in the way of loving God and your relationship with him? Honestly it could, there are plenty of types where their LGBTQ+ representation is the largest portion of their personality and seemingly unable to talk about literally anything else (not to say they/others shouldn't be proud) and that COULD be getting in the way of your relationship with God.

    • Are you loving others the way you would want to be loved? for me personally, as an ally i can confidently say at the foot of God that i have been treating and loving the LGBTQ+ community the way i would want them to love and accept me.

in closing, stop ignoring the bible cause it makes you uncomfortable. challenge yourself, ask why, and remember God made you in your own image, he loved you before you were even born and if the whole worlds population was just you and Jesus, he would have died for you just the same. And even if something ends up being wrong but your intentions were good, its kinda his thing to forgive.


r/OpenChristian • • Mar 10 '24

Is there a Christian church out there that’s not Bible-focused?

0 Upvotes

I’m sure my post will cause some sarcastic replies but I really want to find a church organization that works for me. I love being uplifted from a great message on a Sunday and I love the idea of trying to be a better husband/father/neighbor etc. My issue is that every sermon in most non-denominational Christian churches always has a Biblical foundation and then the sermon branches out from that specific passage of scripture. If I’m being honest, I view the Bible as simply a collection of men’s personal journal entries. Then when men told other men a story thousands of years ago, the story grew in grandeur each time it was told and they sprinkled in a little magic and wizardry and the storyteller had his audience eating out of the palm of his hand and hanging on every word he said. I hate that I have to overlook and do mental gymnastics every time I hear a Biblical story that’s supposed to inspire me but really it just makes me angry because it treats the audience like they’re a bunch of fools. Like when super Dad Abraham takes his son Isaac up a mountain to slit his throat because God told him to. I’m supposed to be inspired by Abraham’s unwavering obedience but really I’m disgusted by him. That’s just one example but I’m looking for a church that’s filled with people who want to be good people but don’t center their lives on the Bible.


r/OpenChristian • • Sep 30 '25

Why shouldnt i hate God?

0 Upvotes

If God exists he hates me. He created me for the explicit purpose of sending me to Hell to suffer for his "glory". I know this to be a fact. I know that either he does not exist and I lack faith for that reason; or if he does that since faith is a "gift" from him and yet necessary for salvation the fact that I still lacked it when I was going to church weekly and praying for it is proof he doesn't want me to have it and created me reprobate.

e: thank you everyone for putting up with my nonsense. I've been in a really dark place mentally lately and it's been causing me to go into these sorts of spirals. Since several people recommended (secular) therapy I would like to say that I did actually recently start going and while we clearly have a lot of work to do it has been helping. Please keep me in your prayers.


r/OpenChristian • • May 18 '25

Is atheism a religion? It dawned on me recently that it might be . Looking at how hardcore atheists talk and behave

0 Upvotes

r/OpenChristian • • Apr 02 '24

If a Christian is vaccinated, eats pork,mixes the fiber of clothes while dressing. She doesn't take the Bible literally,so then why does she take the "unequally yoked" part literally?

9 Upvotes

Was in situationship who was scared shitless about us being unequally yoked,yet she ate bacon, mixed clothe fibers ,was vaccinated and was seemingly "level headed", then why would she take the unequally yoked part literally? What possible justifications did she tell herself to always be so anxious about considering I told her that I'd go to church,and respect her religious beliefs.

Edit: take out the vaccination, I put it cuz many Christians and republicans are anti vax, sorry for assuming


r/OpenChristian • • Oct 05 '24

Should a christian play diablo 4

0 Upvotes

Diablo literally meana devil in spanish


r/OpenChristian • • Nov 08 '16

Please pray that Hillary Clinton becomes the next president of the united states!

0 Upvotes

I want a president that is going to support LGBT rights, religion rights, men's rights, women's rights, gun control, animal rights and all the other important issues. And because of this, please pray that Hillary Clinton wins the election and please vote for Hillary Clinton to be the next president of the united states!


r/OpenChristian • • Sep 22 '25 Bless Up

Not everyone is able to "rejoice" at the sound of a crying baby or screaming toddler in church

6 Upvotes

UPDATE: After reading some of the comments, I realize that I struck a nerve with many people. Perhaps this is due to my neurodivergence itself. Due to my nonverbal learning disability, I find it very difficult to read between the lines. I understand the words that are said, but I don't always understand the words that are implied. I am very literal. Because of this, I sometimes forget that neurotypicals are capable of reading between the lines. I may wind up stating things in a way that seems, to neurotypicals, that I am hinting or implying something else, when in fact I'm not.

It seems that my title, "Not everyone is able to "rejoice" at the sound of a crying baby or screaming toddler in church" gave the wrong impression to some people. While I wasn't intending to imply anything else, it seems that some people felt that I was accusing the entire subreddit of judging me and insisting that I am in the wrong for not rejoicing at the sound of babies crying in church.

I posted this same entry in another Christian subreddit, and I titled it "Welcoming the children AND the neurodivergent in church," and I didn't get the same feedback. In fact, I didn't get any feedback at all, which was what prompted me to make this post and give it a different title. I realize in hindsight that this wasn't a great idea.

I apologize if it seems like I was inferring that children don't belong in church or that I was specifically accusing any of you personally of judging me. That was not my intention. I will try to do better. I am going to deactivate comments on this post.

Original post:

Back in the 1980's, most Christians believed that children should be seen in church but not heard. Many churches had a glass room at the back of the church for babies and toddlers and their families. The sound system was set up so that the people in the glass room could hear the service, but the people in the main part of the church could not hear the people inside the glass room. This way, the babies and toddlers could make noise (as babies and toddlers do) without interrupting the service. Other churches had nurseries or child care available for the little ones during services. Then, there were some denominations that even went so far as to say that a parent taking care of a baby or toddler was exempt from attending church. They discouraged parents from taking their children to church until they were old enough to understand that church is a place where they are expected to be quiet.

Today, most churches have abandoned this way of thinking. Church services are now open to all ages, and we are expected to be tolerant of child sounds in church. Glass rooms are a thing of the past. We are told to rejoice at the sound of babies crying and toddlers squealing or babbling, and that their voices are the voice of God that we came to church to hear. We are also taught that God will judge us harshly if we are annoyed by child sounds or feel that they are a distraction. Anyone who has a problem with child sounds in church, we are taught, is not welcoming or loving to children and needs to change their attitude. Some churches even go so far as to say that people who are annoyed by child sounds are selfish jerks who simply don't belong in church and are just being babies themselves. After all, Jesus said "Let the little children come to me." Therefore, we should be always be open and welcome to any and all sounds and behaviors from children; and shame those adults who feel otherwise.

Sounds good, right? Welcoming people of all ages is a good thing. However, what many Christians (and people of faith in general) don't realize is that by welcoming noisy children and demanding that all adults tolerate them, we are inadvertently making our worship spaces unwelcoming and hostile to another group of vulnerable people: the neurodivergents.

Neurodivergents (or NDs) are people whose brains are wired differently than most people's brains. They include (but are not limited to) people with ADHD, autism, learning disabilities, sensory processing disorder, and other neurological disabilities. Although you usually can't tell that a person is ND just by looking at them, their disorders are just as real as physical disabilities, blindness, deafness, and so forth. People who are not ND are considered neurotypical, (or NT for short).

I myself am ND. I have ADHD and nonverbal learning disability (which means I struggle to understand nonverbal communication) as well as anxiety. In this post, I am going to explain what it is like for me to attend a church service with loud children present, and why the message that "we should all rejoice and never be bothered by child sounds" is harmful and hurtful to ND's. Yes, I realize that most people who say these things do not intend to be hurtful. They are simply ignorant of the ND experience.

Unlike NTs, people with ADHD and similar disorders are unable to tune out unwanted background sound, and focus solely on wanted sound. The part of our brains that filter out unwanted sounds simply does not work, much like a blind person's eyes or a deaf person's ears do not work.

Let's say that I am at a church service with noisy toddlers, and someone is at the front of the church reading Psalm 118 (I chose it because it's a personal favorite of mine). A NT person, who can filter out unwanted sounds, will hear:

"This is the day that the Lord has made. Let us rejoice and be glad."

However, since I can't filter out unwanted sounds, this is what I hear:

"This is the 'AHHHHH!' that the 'ga-ga-ga-ga-ga-ga-GA!' Let us 'EEEEEEEEEEAAAAA' glad."

So you see, it's not that I don't love children or that I don't believe they should be at church. On the contrary, there are times when I welcome the sounds of children in church; such as Christmas pageants and skits, sermons where the preacher asks the children questions, children doing readings, and singing the hymns. The difference is that those are all wanted sounds. They are part of the service, and I'm expecting to hear them, so they are not an interruption. It's the interruption that bothers me, not the children themselves. If children were doing a pageant in church, and in the middle of it, a parent jumped up and yelled "Hey, everybody, that's my son! Isn't he great!" it would be the parent that bothered me, not the kids.

Interruptions are particularly stressful for people with ADHD, and much more so than for NT's. When a NT is concentrating on something and is interrupted, it's like watching a video on YouTube when suddenly an ad comes on. It's mildly annoying, but once the ad is over, the video picks up in the same exact spot where it left off, and after a few seconds, you forget that the interruption even happened.

For people with ADHD, however, interruptions are more like an obsolete form of technology: dial-up internet. For those of you too young to remember the 1990's and early 2000's, that was when we connected to the internet using our landline (house phone). Back then, every home had a landline. Hardly anyone had a cell phone, and the few people who had one couldn't use it to connect to the internet, because WiFi hadn't been invented yet. Unlike today's smartphones, landlines can only do one thing at a time. This meant that when someone else in your house was on the phone, you couldn't use the internet, and vice versa. If someone picked up the phone when you were on the internet, you immediately got disconnected. It didn't matter if they just picked it up for a second and said, "Oops! Sorry, I forgot you were online!" and hung up. It was too late; you were already disconnected. And because dial-up internet wasn't as reliable as today's WiFi, it could be a minute or more before you got connected again. That's how ADHD brains respond to interruptions. They make us feel as though we are "disconnected" from whatever we were doing before the interruption, even if the interruption is only a second or two.

Also, many ND's have a high startle reflex, and so when we hear a particularly loud and unexpected sound, it can cause us to go into "fight-or-flight" mode, and our body releases adrenaline. If the interruption is only a couple of seconds (like most child sounds in church) the amount of adrenaline released is so small that we barely even notice it. That's why we can handle one, two, or even three interruptions from small children during a church service. However, if children constantly make noise throughout the service, the adrenaline builds up and makes us feel increasingly more frustrated and anxious. At this point, we are unable to have the spiritual experience that we come to church for, and leave church feeling worse than when we came in.

Trust me, it's not something that we can just choose to turn off or ignore. It's an extremely unpleasant sensation, and if it were possible to decide not to be bothered by it, I'd have done so a long time ago. I've tried and tried to learn to just tolerate it, but it's not possible; just like it's not possible for a person with a peanut allergy to "just learn to tolerate" peanuts.

So what can churches do to make ND's feel welcome and included in the service? For starters, avoid saying things like "we should always rejoice when we hear a baby screaming in church" or "it's just the sound of the angels, and if you're bothered by it, you're a baby yourself." These type of statements make ND's feel guilty and ashamed about something that is not their fault. Instead, make a statement that people of all abilities are welcome in church and that you understand that some people have neurological differences that make it difficult to focus in a church service when they're constantly being interrupted by unwanted noise that they are unable to filter out. Let them know that they belong, that you understand their concerns, and you are willing to work with them to find a solution that works for all. Also, do not say "Jesus didn't have a problem with loud children, and so you shouldn't, either!" As I mentioned above, it is simply not possible for us to not be bothered by unwanted sounds. It's a reflexive reaction, and believe me, we really wish we didn't have it. You wouldn't tell a person in a wheelchair, "Jesus walked, so you should too!" or tell a person who is mute, "Jesus talked, so you should, too!"

One possible solution is noise-cancelling headphones that have a wireless connection to the sound system. When one is wearing the headphones, the sound from the microphone will be louder, and all other sounds will be quieter. In other words, it works just like the noise-filtering system that NT's have in their brains but ND's do not. I tried such a headset at church recently, and it really worked! I said to myself, "So this is what it's like for NT's!"

Another solution is to have more than one service. Perhaps you could have a family-friendly service on Sunday morning, and a quiet service on Sunday evening for those who prefer a more peaceful, contemplative worship style. In addition to ND"s, many NT's prefer this type of service, which is also valid. If families with young children show up to the evening service, tell them that they are welcome to view the service via Zoom or livestream in a separate room, such as the parish hall or church basement.

You could also consider having a baby room or cry room, like the glass room I mentioned in the first paragraph. Yes, I realize that many parents find such a room unwelcoming. However, you don't need to stay in there for the entire service. You can just take your baby in the room when they start to act up, and then bring them back when they have calmed down. Other parents and children may find that they prefer the glass room.

Another possible solution is to have child care available during all or part of the service. At my church, we have a service for all ages, including the youngest, about once a month. The other Sundays, we start with the welcome, greetings, and opening song; and then all of the children come forward to hear the preacher tell them a story or teach them about Jesus. This lasts for about 5-10 minutes, and then the children all go downstairs. Children 5 and up go to religious education, and the youngest children go to the nursery.

Do not assume that there are no ND"s in your parish. ADHD, autism, and other neurological disorders are more common that most people realize. Some ND's are afraid to speak up for fear of judgement. Others have not been diagnosed and so they don't realize that they are ND. Then there are those who know that they are ND, but they don't realize that their reaction to unwanted sound is a part of their neurological condition, and may not realize that most people don't have the same problem. Let all who enter your church know that they belong, and have accommodations in place just in case they are needed. Don't wait for them to come to you.

To parents: Your children are welcome, loved, and of course very cute; but remember to be mindful of the rest of the congregation. Not everyone can react with joy upon hearing an infant cry or a toddler scream. We understand that raising children is difficult and we will try our best to be patient, and we ask that you be patient with us ND's as well. We will try to be compassionate towards you, as long as you at least are making an effort to get your children to behave, which may mean removing them from the sanctuary for a bit. Do not permit them to run around church screaming, shrieking, or giggling, as that is not appropriate. Also, do not say things such as "if you're so bothered by babies crying, why don't you help the parents out?" ND's are often overwhelmed by sensory overload, adrenaline, and anxiety in such a situation, and we are having enough trouble managing our own emotions without the added responsibility of looking after someone else's kids. It is not appropriate to expect us to take care of your children when we are in such a state; both for our sake and especially for your baby's sake.

To neurodivergents: You are welcome and loved, and your struggles are legitimate and valid. Do not feel guilty or ashamed. God loves you as you are, and will not judge you for feeling frustrated or annoyed by unexpected interruptions. Don't listen to people who tell you otherwise. If God really wasn't okay with your reaction, He would have given you the ability to filter out unwanted sounds. Also, remember that parents are often struggling as well, and don't want to hear their children screaming any more than we do. Try not to judge them, and have compassion for them. Do not be afraid to speak up to your pastor and let them know about any accommodations that you might need.

I hope this is helpful to all!


r/OpenChristian • • Jun 13 '26

Discussion - Social Justice Polyamory is a weak spot in this subreddit

16 Upvotes

This subreddit is openly affirming of queer folk, generally sex positive, and even generally open to things like christopaganism and christian witchcraft.

One thing I’ve noticed, however, is that this subreddit seems to come down hard on polyamory and ethical non-monagamy.

Whenever this question comes up, people are generally non-affirming. And it has come up recently with the overture to the 227th General Assembly of the PC(USA) that would explicitly exclude polyamorous folk from being ordained.

I would suggest that polyamory falls under the queer umbrella as much as being ace does in that polyamory transgresses heteronormative social
norms. Whereas someone who is asexual transgresses norms by non-involvement, someone who is polyamorous transgresses norms by having more than one partner.

If we consider ourselves to be LGBTQ affirming and progressive, why are we so willing to draw a line between what is to be affirmed and what is not?


r/OpenChristian • • Aug 17 '24

Support Thread Is anyone (else) considering exploring a more conservative view of Christianity again?

0 Upvotes

Hi all!

My faith journey has been... a whole journey. Trying to squeeze it in a summary is hard, but let's just say I went from Christian (mostly in name only) to Wiccan, to thinking I might be able to combine Wicca/Goddess worship with also serving the Christian God and Jesus. To exploring Catholicism, to being baptised (again) as an adult after doing a 'Why Jesus?' course in a Vineyard (Evangelical) church and trying to live the complimentarian life to a T for a few years. To becoming more and more 'progressive' (I've always been progressive when it came to politics) and affirming in my beliefs, to being pretty much 'Christian lightTM'. (I believe in universal salvation, for example.) I'm 36, am married and have 3 kids (all under 8) to give some perspective.

It's... hard to even describe what I believe and what I accept as tradition/worthwhile stories at this point. Yet, after close to a decade of being super 'progressive' in my faith I feel the 'pull' to explore more conservative Christianity again.

Am I alone in that? If not... how is the process unfolding for you?

I don't think it's that I feel unmoored or that I want the acceptance of any community. It's not that I fear hell (don't believe in it. Instead, I have feared eternal life in whatever form, but I've come to terms with it since... well, if that's the case then I'll just have to deal with it/make the most of it when it comes.). Do I just fear being wrong? I doubt it's just that.

I'm not sure where I stand now. I think I'll just start by reading the Bible again and see what I make of it without any outside input. I feel (strangely) called to headcovering during prayer and worship. That was something I was interested in over 12 years ago and dabbled in for some time, too. (That was around when I also explored whether Judaism had it right and also looked into Islam (because if I consider the 'earlier' version of the faith might be right it only makes sense I should research the 'follow up' as well. I'm not anything if not logical like that...)

I might crosspost this to another subreddit to get some perspectives from the 'other side' lol.

Above all - I want to follow Jesus, I believe that there is Someone, God, who deeply cares for us and loves all of us and that everything will someday, somehow be alright. That there's purpose to it all.


r/OpenChristian • • Jul 01 '24

Discussion - General Is anyone here pro life?

6 Upvotes

r/OpenChristian • • May 18 '25

Discussion - Theology A ‘political’ image of Christ is incomplete

1 Upvotes

Both Christians on the left and right wish to preserve their image of Christ as a political figure in one way or another. This was why Christ was rejected by the Jews who wanted and expected a political leader and kingly ruler as the Messiah promised by God.

People who intertwine their theology and understanding of Christ as standing for one political cause over another are entirely missing the mark.

When Judas got upset at Jesus for allowing Mary of Bethany to anoint Him in expensive oil, Jesus said that the poor will always exist. We are to accept this and still be called to persistently support and love them. Whether the Church alongside the government are in tandem responsible is up to personal belief.

But regardless, Jesus and His teachings exist outside of political frameworks. He supersedes all of it. And your identity and allegiance should be to Him above all else. If your “brand” of Christianity cannot exist outside political ideology, then seek Him and pray to Him for truth and guidance.

Once we die and our bodies waste away, the very last thing of importance will be politics and the government.


r/OpenChristian • • Dec 20 '25

Did Mary Really Consent to Giving Birth to Jesus? - an interesting, thought-provoking article that I think merits a discussion

Thumbnail
drstaceypatton1865.substack.com
7 Upvotes

r/OpenChristian • • Jan 12 '26

A hug for Jesus

Post image
0 Upvotes

I think he is super cool and I want to hug him so bad.

"I wish I didn't have to share you." Is not a general statement to other people that believe in him.

You can think of it like a little kid not wanting to share their parent or bigger sibling.

Of course Jesus is for everyone! ❤️


r/OpenChristian • • Apr 25 '26

Christians and secular LGBT culture

8 Upvotes

Anybody else exhausted by secular LGBT culture?

if yes, how do you balance the two communities?

Like - yes, I get being very sex-forward is part of your experience. Yes, I know Golden Girls and drag is something you all obsess over. I’m glad that it exists for you, and I’ll try and support you; but it’s just not my thing, and as an asexual trans Christian I find it wearing more than fun.


r/OpenChristian • • Jun 29 '26

Discussion - Sin & Judgment Is it considered disrespectful, blasphemy or a 'sin' to God and/or Jesus to read fanfiction about him and Judas as a couple.....?

0 Upvotes

Listen, I also didn’t expect this to be the question I was ever going to ask on any sub whatsoever.....but pls don't judge too hard.

I'm not Christian (I'm hindu), but I respect all religions and Gods and I do not want (any) God to look at me and think I'm mocking Him or that I'm being disrespectful.....I just saw this really beautiful edit on TikTok and yeah...


r/OpenChristian • • Jan 17 '24

Can we talk about implicit antisemitism in progressive Christianity?

23 Upvotes

It's not uncommon to see progressives worry about the "God of the Old Testament" being cruel or unloving or otherwise bad/deficient while the "God of the New Testament" is loving and good. The unspoken implication (and I think people are usually genuinely unaware of this) is that Jews worship and follow a bad God or a misunderstanding of God, since the New Testament allegedly reveals what God is actually like.

Side note: I recently asked a Jewish forum about their interpretations of passages from the Hebrew Bible that progressives often find 'problematic', like the conquest of Canaan. I received responses from dozens of Jews, reconstructionist to reform to conservative to orthodox, and all but one said they don't interpret these passages metaphorically and they see then as the true history of their tribal origins and their relationship with God as His chosen people. I add this because I always heard vague things from Christians about Jews taking all these passages as mostly metaphorical and I was genuinely surprised to learn that there's a good deal of consensus that the passages are literal and aren't problematic.


r/OpenChristian • • Apr 05 '26

Is it a sin to have sex on Easter?

0 Upvotes

I’m sorry if my title seems stupid to you guys, but i’ve been dealing with religious and sexual OCD for almost 8 years now and while I wholly subscribe to the more progressive Christian views, I also tend to have cognitive fusion to a large degree and I will obsess over something like this: I have non-marital sex which is already a sin, if I have non-marital sex on Easter will that lead to a bigger punishment i.e. i will get hit by a car or fail my exams?

Please tell me if it is a bigger sin because if so it will calm my intrusive thoughts at least


r/OpenChristian • • Apr 06 '25 Unity Confused Love

I BURNED A BIBLE. NOT BECAUSE I LOST MY FAITH—BUT BECAUSE I FINALLY FOUND IT.

Thumbnail
gallery
107 Upvotes

I already posted this in r/Christianity. Let’s see who’s ready for a deeper conversation about faith, fire, and freedom.

I know this post might get me banned, downvoted, or crucified in the comments. That’s fine. I’ve been called every name in the book already—crazy, blasphemous, deluded, lost, the Antichrist. But here’s the thing: I’m not lost.

I’ve heard the voice of GOD—and I followed that. Not a preacher. Not a verse. Not a fucking rulebook written by kings and edited by empires.

I’m done pretending that loving God means fearing God. God is not a dictator. God is not a weapon. God is your best fucking friend. God made you exactly as you are. You know when you're doing wrong—that’s God, not guilt. That’s your built-in compass, not shame. And I trust that.

That’s why I burned a Bible.

Not out of hatred—but out of love. Love for a Creator who cannot, and will not, be caged inside a book that’s been manipulated by powerful men and sold like a spiritual product for profit.

I gave God everything—my heart, my identity, my love, my time. I’ve prayed my soul raw. I’ve forgiven people who hurt me so deeply it ripped something open in me. And I’ve been broke as hell, living in my mom’s basement, still showing up for strangers online, loving everyone from gay atheists to confused Christians.

Not for clout. GOD KNOWS I’ve received none. I did it because I believe in the voice of God I heard. Not the one behind pulpits, but the one inside me.

And the Bible? Yeah, it points to God sometimes. But it’s also been used to justify:

Slavery

Misogyny

Homophobia

Genocide

Rape

Silence of victims

Abuse of power

Shame

And if you're afraid to question it, ask yourself why. Because GOD doesn’t fear your questions. She welcomes them.

GOD didn’t write the Bible with Her own hands. Men did. Flawed men. Fragile men. Power-hungry men. And they weren’t more special than you or me.

Yet people cling to that book like it’s the fourth member of the Trinity.

Even atheists won’t burn it—not because they believe in it, but because they’re still scared of the idea that “maybe” God is real and angry.

But God has never been angry with me. God respected me for burning it. Because it was never about destroying something sacred—it was about destroying the illusion that God only lives in pages.

There are thousands of translations. Which one is the “true” word? Because I collect Bibles—and they do not agree. I burned one. Out of love. To prove that my relationship with the Divine isn’t bound to a book. It’s bigger than that. It’s deeper than that. It’s ALIVE.

When I burned that Bible, I knelt beside it, prayed, and I heard God say: “Thank you for having the courage to set Me free.”

And I felt free too. No guilt. Just peace. Real peace.

I’m not religious. I believe in the message of Jesus—just not the franchise. I believe worship belongs to God, and to the people in our lives who embody God’s love. Not to systems. Not to dogma. And definitely not to people selling salvation by the hour.

I’m not deconstructing. I’m reclaiming what was never supposed to be stolen. LOVE. TRUTH. FREEDOM.

If you’re offended? Cool. Bring me your verses. But I’ll trust the voice of GOD HERSELF over a thousand cherry-picked scriptures.

But if this helps even one person breathe a little easier in their skin? That’s enough for me.

I’m not here to be worshipped. I’m not here to argue. I’m not claiming I’m 1000% right and you’re 1000% wrong. I’m just saying what GOD told me to say.

Because truth? Truth was never meant to be comfortable. It was meant to set people free.

And maybe the first step is this: Stop boxing in God. Let Her live. Let YOU live.

If you disagree, cool. GOD bless. If you agree, also GOD bless. Now go build your own connection with the Divine. Not based on fear. Not based on rules. But based on LOVE.

Peace be with you. No matter what.


r/OpenChristian • • Sep 05 '26

Discussion - Sex & Relationships OnlyFans?

0 Upvotes

Is it a sin for my wife and I to make an OnlyFans?

We are $30k in CC debt, and I am a graduate student who is halfway complete. Is it easy money?


r/OpenChristian • • Feb 28 '18

Good Riddance: Billy Graham Made Queer Lives Hell on Earth

Thumbnail
them.us
7 Upvotes

r/OpenChristian • • Feb 17 '24

The only reason people oppose abortion is because they can't stand that women won't allow themselves to be tied down by their anatomy.

Thumbnail self.proabortion
21 Upvotes

r/OpenChristian • • Jul 09 '26

Discussion - Sex & Relationships Was Jesus practicing abstinence, or was he asexual?

0 Upvotes

I’m curious about the theological perspective on this. Traditional teaching says Jesus chose to remain celibate, meaning he could feel temptation but chose not to act on it. But looking at it from a modern perspective, could it be argued he was asexual (lacking sexual attraction entirely)? How do you view this?