r/Critics • • Dec 31 '25

Why does a Melania Trump documentary even exist? Who is this for?

1.1k Upvotes

This feels completely unnecessary.

Melania Trump built her public image on being private, distant, and largely silent which is her right. But that’s exactly why a documentary about her feels empty. There’s no new insight, no revealed influence, no unexplored story. Just silence repackaged as depth.

It doesn’t feel informative or timely. It feels like reputation management disguised as a documentary.

Who is this actually for?


r/Critics • • Feb 25 '21

I hate Film buffs who only like Old movies and think new movies suck

96 Upvotes

We all know those movie buffs who their top 20 movies are all from before 1960 and has a lot of foreign language films and most are which the general public has never heard of. Then they try to think they know movies better and think they are smarter because they only like these boring long deep meaning movies. Or think they are smarter because they think inception is dumb.

I very much consider myself a film buff and while I like some of those movies too, I also love like finding nemo star wars, the dark knight (my all time favorite movie), the matrix, the social network etc. And movies like godzilla or step brothers I wouldn't consider the greatest movies ever or even some of my favorite but they are still fun and thats the point of movies to enjoy them not to only sit and try and get through them and take notes and try and find the hidden meanings.

Let me know your thoughts and hopefully I'm not alone


r/Critics • • Apr 12 '21

Bad Camera Angles Ruined the Monster Hunter Movie Spoiler

Thumbnail
youtube.com
80 Upvotes

r/Critics • • Jun 10 '24

Presumed Innocent (2024) Review – Jake Gyllenhaal Is Miscast In Underwhelming Legal Thriller

Thumbnail
geekvibesnation.com
63 Upvotes

Jake Gyllenhaal is woefully miscast in the role of Rusty Sabich, and it becomes increasingly evident as the series progresses.


r/Critics • • Jun 07 '21

Nelk’s Happy Dad Hard Seltzer

49 Upvotes

What do you guys think of Nell launching this alcohol brand? Haven’t seen any reviews yet, but their fans are very hyped about it. So I feel like some reviews may be bias(ed)? I for one feel like their marketing is obviously aimed at young adults, even though they state in their videos that they want it to be seperet from Nelk and is going to be for everyone of all ages to drink. What do you guys think? Thanks btw


r/Critics • • Mar 06 '21

“Mystery Box” shows and why any finale is most likely disappointing.

42 Upvotes

So a mystery box show- I’m talking Lost, X-Files, BSG, anything that teases a “big answer” at the end. Almost invariably the finales when “all is revealed” is going to be a disappointment.

Half the fun of these shows, the thing that keeps people coming back is trying to figure out what’s going on, trying to spot clues. An army of Marvel fans trying to figure out Wandavision is more likely to come up with a better ending than Marvel writers can ever dream of. Lost fans early on speculated the Island was purgatory, and damn if that wouldn’t have answered a lot- but the writers read the boards, answered questions on a podcast and damn it if they were going to make the Island purgatory (In the end- everybody does die.... eventually at there own time and the cast meets up again in some non-purgatory afterlife waiting room)

Now with Lost, the writers- after a decade were finally candid about the network not letting them answer the mystery and just keep people coming back as long as they could. I will say if anyone learned a lesson from Lost it’s Damon Lindeloff who just put together an amazing Watchmen series with a beginning, middle and ending.

But still, no answer will make all audiences happy. As I note at the beginning half the fun, and almost the whole point of these shows is to keep people guessing and theorizing. Like some famous cat in a box, it’s at the point when we don’t know if it’s alive or dead- that point when it’s actually both alive and dead at the same time that makes the show worthwhile.


r/Critics • • Jul 29 '25

What’s the best movie by a bad director?

38 Upvotes

r/Critics • • Nov 15 '25

A brilliant performance, in your opinion, from a critically panned film: Bryan Brown as Doug Coughlin: Cocktail

Post image
37 Upvotes

r/Critics • • Mar 02 '24

2024's WORST MOVIE OF THE YEAR IS HERE: Megamind 2 Review

37 Upvotes

I was excited to hear that Megamind 2 was happening since i loved the first one so much, then the trailer got out and it was fucking garbage, from visuals to dialogue to characters all of it was just so fucking bad it breaks my heart. Anyways enough about the trailer let's go to the actual movie, it sucks it really sucks i hate it so much.

The visuals look so cheap like it was made from a C-list animation studio in China and it's such a big downgrade from the amazing animation of the first one, it just feels like Peacock manipulated our nostalgia for the film and made a quick cash snatch from us, Jimmy Neutron and Big Mouth look more visually appealing than this. And i don't blame DreamWorks oh no no no this as all purely Peacock's fault because if DreamWorks did animate this it would look visually appealing.

The plot, i have never seen a more bland, mundane, boring, flat, uninteresting plot since Madame Web, and that was a week ago. This is the most forgettable plot in any superhero movie ever, i literally had to google the plot 5 minutes after i watched the movie because it felt like such a nothing sandwich watching it, basically Megamind's old buddies are evil, like Peacock, and they want to destroy metro city and send it to the moon, so Megamind, Roxanne, Chum, and some random kid assemble to stop them. Now don't get me wrong it sounds good on paper, The Doom Syndicate? sounds really fucking epic, old friends of Megamind? what a pleasant surprise. but Despicable Me 3 already did something closely like that and it's 10x better.

And the writing is just painful. The puns never land but it's like they're desperate for it to land, the final fight between Megamind and The Doom Syndicate feels like a pre-viz of the final fight that they just left in there, and Keiko is an annoying little shit that contributes nothing to the plot

Overall, since Megamind 2 already has a 9% rating on Google, i'll go even lower, Megamind 2 is a disgrace of a film that while the concept is interesting, the execution is the worst this industry has ever seen, it's not worth your time, your family's time, your children's time, your enemy's time, or anyone's time. and sits royally at a whopping hard 2%


r/Critics • • Jul 24 '21

A Fight/Argument Broke At Our Local Cinema… Because Someone Didn’t Want To Put Their Phone Away

29 Upvotes

At my local showing of “Black Widow” Someone politely asked a person next to them to turn their phone off, cuz the brightness was distracting.

This person started yelling and ruined the first half hour of the film… the cops had to be called

The cinema did give us free tickets… But seriously!?!? We just finally went back to the movies after a pandemic, and people forgot how to have respect and manners at the movies.

Has anyone else noticed the movie theatre experience has gotten worst?? Or is if just me

If you want the full story you can watch the video below at the 1:09 mark. But this is the jist of it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LsMitdPj6U&t=69s


r/Critics • • Feb 16 '26

Why is picking a movie harder than watching one?

28 Upvotes

Anyone else face this problem?


r/Critics • • Oct 11 '26

Digger is one of the most ambitious Hollywood swings in recent memory. Throwing my hat in the Digger ring

24 Upvotes

I have finally put my hat in the Digger discourse. Dig dig dig. I'm so glad Tom Cruise has joined forces with another auteur in his catalog. The discourse surrounding Digger has heavily centered on the massive $150–180 million budget, and how big of a creative and financial risk this has been for everybody involved. Along, with critics lambasting it for the lack of "humor" and self-indulgent tendencies both stylistically and politically. It certainly has a lot to say about current politics, overconsumption, power, and environmental catastrophe. Digger has safely divided fans and critics alike.

Having seen it, I lean FOR Digger. I adored it. I was especially interested in how the film uses its absurdist humor and Cruise’s larger-than-life performance to explore a world that feels increasingly farcical. It lets out all the current frustrations about where we are going and sums it up in an entertaining, loud fashion. I don't know how else one can encapsulate what we're all feeling. What stuck with me most, though, was how it illustrates the complicated relationship with creating art, especially political art, when you don't have power to change the things you're criticizing. The feeling of powerlessness that comes with watching the world fall apart.

I wrote a review exploring why I think the film’s ambition and messiness are part of what make it so interesting.

I’d genuinely love to hear what other people think. Does Digger earn its swings, or does its ambition get the better of it? And what do you think the film says about the place of original, auteur-driven movies in Hollywood today? I'm sure you all have thoughts LOL.

I don't want to self-promote, but if you want to an extended version of my thoughts feel free to request my Substack review and I'd be happy to send it over.


r/Critics • • Oct 04 '26

Digger (2026) review

19 Upvotes

(For the record, I wanted to write a spoiler-inclusive review, but seeing as almost no one has watched this movie yet, I have chosen not to)

Some movies try and say a lot of things and end up saying nothing. Others aim for nothing and hit it. Digger is a movie that wants to say a lot, and it does, though it’s not what you think. Digger opened this weekend to mixed reviews from critics and a certified box office catastrophe. Having waited until after viewing to read other reviews, I walked out of the theater confused as to whether I had seen the same film critics were mostly panning.

The movie tells the story, seemingly, of Digger Rockwell (Tom Cruise), an oil baron tasked with saving the world from natural disaster caused by his aggressive drilling and refusal to heed scientists’ warnings. At first, it sounds like a Dr. Strangelove-esque disaster satire, a black comedy designed to criticize the wealthy climate deniers and incompetent government officials who put us in an apocalyptic position for personal gain. It sounds alright if not a little uninspired in this day and age (consider Don’t Look Up, Mountainhead). But Digger is not that at all. In fact, it mocks those types of films for their one-note heavy handedness, lecturing audiences on obvious points so blatantly that they have no real impact or resonance. The film ends up delivering something much more original, interesting, and profound.

The first twenty minutes are straightforward, introducing the story that the trailers and marketing present. Digger in his sprawling estate receives news that his oil rig in Greenland exploded and a massive glacier has formed, hurtling towards Europe. He briefs the ailing president (John Goodman) and his cabinet of Bible-thumping sycophants, whose possible solutions to the apocalypse range from prayer, bombing the glacier, and blaming Al Gore. It’s a fine start to the film, but in terms of timely satire, it plays no better or worse than an average SNL cold open.

Then the film does something that, initially, feels like it changes everything. I won’t call it a “twist”, because it doesn’t function the way classic story twists do. The Usual Suspects, The Prestige, The Sixth Sense and other films revolve nearly entirely around their plot twists, shocking reveals at the end of the film on which the entire story hinges. (What, really, is Usual Suspects about other than the reveal of Keyser Soze’s identity?) This story development in Digger comes early and at first offers promise. But almost immediately after, I felt frustrated. The story felt cheaper, the development unearned and seemingly pointless, and whatever momentum it had been building disappeared.

After languishing for another thirty minutes, Cruise’s character delivers a speech to the European Commission in what has to be one of the best scenes of the last twenty-five years. He storms around the auditorium, verbally and physically fighting the crowd, and criticizing the bureaucrats for their hypocrisy. The nearly single take used could feel like a theatrical gimmick, but given what we know about the story unfolding, it’s not. The film starts to give us more and more information, building on the surprise development. And quickly, it starts to fall into place.

Digger isn’t a superficial, ‘rich people are bad, look at how silly they are’ film like the aforementioned examples or White Lotus. It actually has tremendous contempt for those types of works, whilst still endorsing their obvious and true message. At one point, Cruise’s character mentions how cliché the film’s events feel. He describes his own actions as exaggerated, critiques the trope of the hapless vice-president (Michael Stuhlbarg), and explains that at least some of the people involved are actually a lot more competent and sinister than just ignorant buffoons. The film is even critical of audiences who revel in these stories—not the film’s own audience, but rather those who delight in such easy and broad criticisms and how unproductive they can be.

Jesse Plemons’ character gives a monologue that highlights the tonal line Digger walks. In it, there’s a positive, compelling interpretation that art is important, it can bring people together under the worst of circumstances and, if done right, can tell powerful stories. Simultaneously, his character also provides an argument that those powerful people responsible for tragedy can feign magnanimity and still escape the consequences of their actions.

It feels like in most reviews I’ve read, the critics must have left somewhere before the hour mark. Up until that point, the film was frustrating and aimless. But as the credits roll, it’s clear why and all is forgiven. This is a great movie, and the last film that Warner Brothers will ever make as an independent studio before its imminent absorption by Paramount Skydance on Tuesday. The box office disaster is someone else’s problem now; Digger is a worthy note for such a storied studio to go out on, one sure to undergo serious critical re-evaluation in the coming years.


r/Critics • • Nov 19 '21

Dune is a Phenomenal Achievement in Film Making

16 Upvotes

https://youtu.be/ZVGCz1VtZMo?t=112

In an age when CGI can show us anything, this movie caught my eye not with spectacle but its complete commitment to creating an alien-human culture. Set design, costuming, and ship design felt more important than they ever have before. There is no limit to what a movie can show these days so to carry any weight it has to be something worth seeing.


r/Critics • • Jul 24 '26

He-man 2026 TF did I Just Watch?!

15 Upvotes

I must rant a bit as I've just now watched the new adaptation of He-man.

I was awful! I went into it fully expecting it to be over the top campy, but this was aggressive campy. Also, how dare they being Arora into this?!

It was so so so bad.

Nope! Everyone is fired! That. Was. Horrible.


r/Critics • • Apr 28 '21

Stowaway (2021) - Brand New Netflix Original Sci-fi Movie Review! - "the score is subtle and haunting, but knows when to go hard during some incredibly tense moments later on"

Thumbnail
youtu.be
15 Upvotes

r/Critics • • May 03 '21

The Mitchells vs the Machines (2021) - The Animated Charmer Of The Year

Thumbnail
moviemeisterreviews.com
13 Upvotes

r/Critics • • Mar 27 '21

A Beginner's Guide to Argentine Cinema

Thumbnail
youtube.com
13 Upvotes

r/Critics • • Oct 07 '24

Caddo Lake is yet another example of a great concept hampered by poor execution and one that is not only dull, but also kind of boring. Read more in our spoiler-free review.\ \ #MovieReview #StreamingReview #caddolake #hbomax #max #moviereviews Spoiler

Thumbnail
keithlovesmovies.com
12 Upvotes

r/Critics • • Sep 25 '21

Kate & A Gunpowder Milkshake | Netflix Movie Reviews

12 Upvotes

Full Version Here.

Netflix has recently released a couple of female led action movies; Kate starring Mary Elizabeth Winstead and Gunpowder Milkshake starring Karen Gillian.

They're both similar stories with nearly identical premises, but unique enough that they don't just blend into each other. Both stories center on a female assassin who, after getting betrayed by their former employers, go on revenge murder quests in search for their would-be killers before they run out of time. They both even have nearly identical backstories. The basic losing their parents as kids and being taken in by a shadowy organization with their mentor training them to be assassins. And to top it all off, the both end up protecting an innocent child who ends up caught in the middle of it all after they themselves killed the child's father.

So yeah, on paper these two Netflix movies are basically the same story, but their each executed in different ways and styles that make them interesting watches, each in their own way.

Both leads were great in their respective roles. In Gunpowder Milkshake, Karen probably had more ridiculous action sequences and slightly goofier story overall, yet her character was extremely serious all the way through. And Mary played her much more serious role with a bit more levity. In fact, the same can be said for the whole movie. It's a very violent and bloody affair, that while serious, manages to have just a bit of fun with some of it's scenarios.

The supporting casts in both of these film was also surprisingly deep with actors like Woody Harrelson, Lena Headey, Angela Basset, and more. Ultimately, they weren't all given the screen-time they all deserved, but you could tell they were all just having fun onscreen. I'm always a fan of watching serious in less than serious roles.

And as far as the action goes, both were really anything but expected. They took a page out of John Wick's playbook with some creative use of gun-fu that lent itself to some quite fun scenes that could be straight up vicious at some points. They're both a lot of fun to watch, which is kind of the selling point for both of these movies.

There isn't a ton of character work or even much a fully story. It's mostly just brutal action pieces held together by the faintest of storylines, although I will give them credit for having a couple of secondary storylines that add a bit of depth to the movie.

Although one thing that didn't quite make sense in both movies was just how easily the young girls switch from scared hostage/victim to willing accomplices. I liked watching the girls as the wannabe badasses, and understand why their kept around, but it's their transition that  just feels odd; especially in Kate. Gunpowder Milkshake didn't go so far as to make the little girl excited about killing people, but she was still too willing to go along with the assassin she just witnessed murder a few people.

But both Kate and Gunpowder Milkshake are really fun action movies with interesting enough stories behind the action and just enough goofiness to them to make the audience smile and root for the killer.

And if you're interested in and like these two movies, then you should also check out the 2020 movie Ava starring Jessica Chastain. It's got almost exactly the same premise as these do, but a bit more grounded action sequences, better secondary plotlines, and a lot more in-depth character work. It's something you'll probably enjoy as well. And maybe even The Protégé starring Maggie Q, Samuel L. Jackson, and Michael Keaton too.


r/Critics • • Dec 21 '11

Rachel Getting Married

Thumbnail
classy-films.com
12 Upvotes

r/Critics • • Jan 23 '23

I know different people have different opinions, but...I mean, look at the duration of this

Post image
10 Upvotes

r/Critics • • Jul 31 '21

The Suicide Squad Review (2021) - One of the Best Comic-Book Adaptions

10 Upvotes

https://youtu.be/kWd_POKfirQ

A ferociously funny, foul-mouthed and ultra-violent film... That somehow made us care about these criminals turned superheroes

James Gunn has done the impossible… He managed to make one of the best Comic book films that no one asked for

You’ll have a great time!


r/Critics • • 9d ago

Been Frustrated with How Critics Approach Risk-Taking Films like Digger

Post image
9 Upvotes

I wrote a piece on my Substack recently that has echoed in my mind for a minute about the state of film criticism, especially as it relates to auteur-driven risk-taking films. Films that lay it all on the line for the sake of art and expression. Films like Megalopolis, Babylon, and most recently Digger. I'm thinking the hundreds of million dollar risks that get pounced by critics who complain of their "excess" that are "doing too much". That's the general hostility and vibe I get from critics with these kind of projects.

The films I mentioned are all different films, and I'm not suggesting they're all successful. I've disliked ambitious auteur projects myself. But I've noticed how quickly conversations around these films become dominated by their budgets, box-office failures, and whether they were worth the financial risk. The films themselves almost become secondary to the spectacle of their failure. That there's a sort of glee that the critics take in a major Hollywood risk failing, as if they're parroting the tune of the top brass of Hollywood studios who don't want to fund expensive art in favor of sure-fire moneymakers.

A critic obviously isn't obligated to like a film, and I don't think filmmakers should be immune to harsh criticism just because they have an ambitious vision. But should critics have some responsibility beyond evaluating individual works? Shouldn't they also advocate for the continued existence of a film culture where filmmakers can take enormous creative risks, even when those risks don't pay off commercially? I mean on some level critics should endorse projects that fit the vision for the landscape they want to see, instead of punishing films that contribute to that. Especially, when the reaction to mediocrity is uneventful.

As I mentioned, I wrote a longer piece about this in relation to the violent responses to Digger that I felt were completely unwarranted. But, I'm genuinely curious if other people here have thought about this dynamic in modern film criticism. Please let me know your thoughts. I will also gently put my substack link if you want to read more of my thoughts:

https://abhinavyerramreddy.substack.com/p/why-do-critics-punish-creativity?r=38m95e&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=post%20viewer


r/Critics • • May 01 '24

The Idea of You is a delightful, smart, and heartfelt romcom led by a terrific pair of performances by Anne Hathaway and Nicholas Galitzine. Read more in our spoiler-free review. #MovieReview #StreamingReview #moviereviews #primevideo #theideaofyou Spoiler

Thumbnail
keithlovesmovies.com
9 Upvotes