Hi everyone,
I'd like to share an experience I recently had with Binance and get some opinions from people who may have encountered something similar.
I opened a LONG position on DOT/USDT with the following parameters:
Entry price: 0.855
Leverage: x10
Isolated margin
Position size: 17,258 DOT
My own funds: 2,500 USDT
Liquidation price initially displayed by Binance: 0.76
However, my position was liquidated at 0.839, which was significantly higher than the liquidation price shown when I opened the trade.
After contacting Binance Support, I was informed that the liquidation risk ratio had changed from 1.05 to 1.15, while the borrowed amount remained unchanged. Support also confirmed this information in writing.
My main question concerns the application of these changes to existing positions. The notice about the updated parameters did not clearly explain that they would also apply to trades that had already been opened.
I understand that leveraged trading involves risks, and I'm not questioning that. However, I'd like to understand how liquidation parameters can change after a position has been opened and what information traders are supposed to rely on when assessing their liquidation risk.
I've contacted Binance Support several times, but I haven't received a clear explanation of how the new risk ratio resulted in my liquidation at 0.839.
I have screenshots, trading history, and written correspondence with Binance Support documenting the situation.
Has anyone experienced something similar? Is this how changes to liquidation risk parameters normally work on Binance, including for existing isolated-margin positions?
I'd appreciate any insights or explanations.

The theft took about 20 minutes. The groundwork took five months, and AI played a part at two key steps.

In June, a Binance wallet engineer searched for a popular AI coding tool and installed a tampered version. Binance caught it and replaced his laptop, but the attackers had already learned who worked on the wallet team.

In September, they approached a second engineer on a job platform, posing as a project director. After a round of interviews, they asked him to download a coding assignment onto his work computer. It contained malicious code.

From there, they used Binance’s own internal AI tool to reach two more wallet engineers, eventually getting a token that let them deploy code inside the system that signs wallet transactions.

Needless to say, the AI assistant was very helpful. Just to the wrong person.

On October 29, Binance’s own signing service approved the transfers. About $6.3B left in roughly 20 minutes, without a single private key leaking.

AI was the bait first, then the shortcut.

Binance’s post-mortem opens with a rare admission: this should not have happened.

If you hold crypto, the lesson is simple. Be careful what you install on the device that touches your wallets, especially the new AI tool everyone’s talking about.

Looking for the best MEXC Referral Code in 2026? Use “mexc-MXBonus” when signing up to explore the opportunity to receive up to 12,000 USDT in rewards. This referral code is worth considering for new cryptocurrency traders who want to maximize their welcome benefits and access exclusive promotional opportunities.

Before creating your account, remember to enter the exact code mexc-MXBonus to take advantage of the advertised referral offer.

Why Use MEXC Referral Code “mexc-MXBonus”?

The MEXC Referral Code “mexc-MXBonus” gives eligible new users an opportunity to explore welcome rewards and additional trading benefits.

Here are the main advantages:

• Up to 12,000 USDT: Access advertised welcome reward opportunities.

• Exclusive Referral Code: Enter mexc-MXBonus during registration.

• New User Rewards: Explore promotional campaigns for eligible accounts.

• Global Trading Access: Discover cryptocurrency trading opportunities on MEXC.

• Easy Activation: Apply the referral code during signup.

• Additional Benefits: Complete qualifying tasks to unlock available rewards.

How to Use MEXC Referral Code “mexc-MXBonus”

Follow these simple steps to activate your referral offer:

1. Visit the official MEXC website.

2. Click Sign Up and create a new account.

3. Enter referral code “mexc-MXBonus” in the referral field.

4. Complete registration and any required verification.

5. Visit the rewards center to check available promotions.

6. Complete eligible tasks to claim applicable rewards.

Is “mexc-MXBonus” the Best MEXC Referral Code in 2026?

If you are searching for the Best MEXC Referral Code 2026, mexc-MXBonus is worth considering. With an advertised reward opportunity of up to 12,000 USDT, this code offers eligible new users a reason to check the available welcome promotions before registering.

Make sure you enter the correct code during signup to avoid missing the opportunity to participate in applicable referral campaigns.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the MEXC Referral Code for 2026?

The featured referral code is mexc-MXBonus.

How much can I get with mexc-MXBonus?

Eligible new users can explore promotional rewards of up to 12,000 USDT, subject to campaign conditions.

Can existing MEXC users use this code?

Referral promotions are generally intended for eligible new users. Check the official terms for details.

Is the 12,000 USDT reward guaranteed?

No. The maximum advertised reward may require completing specific tasks and meeting promotional requirements.

Final Verdict

If you plan to join MEXC in 2026, don't forget to use MEXC Referral Code “mexc-MXBonus” during registration.

Best Global MEXC Referral Code 2026: mexc-MXBonus

Sign up with the exact code mexc-MXBonus and explore the opportunity to receive up to 12,000 USDT in rewards. Always review the official promotion terms and eligibility requirements before participating.

AP and Reuters have called both chambers for Democrats after the 3 November midterms. The new congressional terms begin on 3 January 2027. Trump remains president.

Short term: expectations can shift before the rules do. The election itself does not change which crypto services businesses can offer.

Medium term: a divided government could make new legislation harder to agree on. For a bank considering crypto custody or stablecoin payments, uncertainty about requirements and costs could affect whether a launch goes ahead. Clear, workable protections could help participation and trust; delays or excessive burdens could discourage it. Agency decisions also matter.

Long term: legal access is only one part of adoption. A payment service still needs to be useful, reliable and competitive once all fees are included.

My interpretation: I would watch the specific proposals and their practical effects before calling this good or bad for crypto. The party balance alone does not tell us whether adoption will accelerate, and a Bitcoin price move would not prove that it had.

Which crypto service would benefit most from clearer rules, and what would its users actually gain?

Hey guys

NY state seems to have a lot of restrictions.

What are we using for flexibility, and lowest possible fees, and that’s also safe?

My specific situation, I want to buy whatever crypto basically for free ideally, then exchange it to USDT BEP20 for the lowest possible fees, then send it to another wallet lol. And I wanna keep as much of my money as possible and not run into any issues lol.

Any advice on that?

But also in general, FOR THE NY RESIDENTS which platforms are your go tos?

I’m generally not a fan of the mainstream ones like Coinbase and Gemini. Feels like theirs always something going on with those guys

With the U.S. midterm elections taking place today, I’m expecting sharp swings over the coming days and into next week.

Bitcoin is testing the upper bull market support band around $76.7K. The lower boundary sits around $73.0K, with the 200-day average nearby at roughly $73.2K in this chart snapshot.

My base case is a deeper pullback into the band, potentially with another test of the recent lows.

If those lows break and Bitcoin fails to recover them, that would strengthen my downside case and bring the lower band and 200-day average into sharper focus.

If buyers defend the lows and Bitcoin reclaims the upper band, that would strengthen the case for a medium-term low forming within this pullback. A bounce alone wouldn’t confirm it; I want to see whether buyers can sustain the recovery.

The candles are 1H; the support band is weekly and the 200-day average uses daily data.

What would convince you the lows are holding: a successful retest, sustained closes above support, or something else?

October still has time left, but CoinGlass’s 31 October snapshot at 10:18 UTC showed Bitcoin down 7.23% for the month. October 2025 finished down 3.95% in the same dataset.

That would make two red Octobers in a row unless Bitcoin recovers substantially before the close. A strong historical month can still disappoint. Seasonality gives us context; it does not create buying demand.

I’m Tobias, CBC’s founder. My recovery test is buyers defending the bull market support band—the 20-week SMA and 21-week EMA—followed by a reclaim of the 50-day SMA. I’d want a daily close above that average and evidence it holds, not a brief move through it. Neither condition is being called confirmed.

A red October doesn’t mean November has to fall, and November doesn’t owe us a rebound.

Has “Uptober” changed how you read this month, or do you largely ignore calendar patterns?

Binance estimates the impact of its overnight security incident at $6.3 billion, with roughly $3 billion frozen. Frozen does not mean recovered.

The exchange says it will cover losses through SAFU and company funds. That is a commitment, not confirmation that customers have already been repaid. As of its 30 October update, Binance says deposits operate normally while withdrawals remain paused.

Bitcoin briefly approached $76,000 during 29–30 October, before recovering some ground.

How can an exchange hack affect the wider market?

• Confidence: uncertainty can make investors more cautious about exchange custody and taking risk.

• Access to funds: paused withdrawals restrict traders’ ability to move assets between platforms.

• Liquidations: falling prices can force leveraged long positions to close, potentially adding selling pressure.

An exchange breach does not, by itself, establish a failure of Bitcoin’s underlying network. The investigation, safe withdrawal restoration and delivery on Binance’s coverage commitment remain important to watch.

CBC's view: I see this incident as a catalyst for the sell-off, although the chart alone cannot establish how much of the move it caused. We intend to use this weakness as an opportunity to work toward our planned target allocations, positioning for a potential next leg up.

That is our outlook, not a confirmed bottom. Prices could fall further, and we will reassess if the investment case changes.

Does this dip fit your existing plan, or has the incident changed your investment case?

Hi guys, i found this chart breaking down how rate cycles actually impact Bitcoin. Rate cycles set the broad backdrop for BTC, but they rarely trigger the exact timing of its tops or bottoms. You can look at the past year alone: Bitcoin topped back in October 2025 while the Fed was actively cutting rates, and it bottomed out in June 2026 when the rates were on pause, just weeks after inflation topped at 4.2%.

The September rate hike is where things get interesting. BTC is actually up about 8% since that hike went through, which breaks the historical trend. Going back to 2015, after 17 out of the last 20 Fed hikes, Bitcoin was trading lower 30 days later.
Whether this current bounce holds will come down to what tomorrow's guidance and the upcoming data look like, but it shows that BTC doesn't always follow the textbook rate hike. NFA.

For those who use multiple wallets and exchanges, how do you keep track of your actual crypto profits and losses?

I've found that checking portfolio balances doesn't always tell the full story. Purchase prices, transaction fees, transfers between wallets, and DeFi activity can make it difficult to calculate your real performance over time.

I've also been looking into tools that solve this problem, and came across Cryptofolio, which is building a crypto portfolio tracker focused on cost basis, transaction history, and actual P&L.

They're currently accepting waitlist signups for early access.

How do you currently manage your crypto records? Do you use a dedicated tracker, spreadsheets, or something else?

I still get a bit nervous every time I send crypto. Double-checking addresses, making sure I didn’t miss a character… it doesn’t feel as simple as it should be. Sending money shouldn’t feel like this in 2026.

Do you think the issue is the technology itself or just how it’s designed?

Bitcoin closed last week near $80K. On 26 October, the bull market support band’s upper edge is near $77K, below the 20/50-day SMAs around $82K.

My view is cautious: a band test looks likely, but its name doesn’t guarantee buyers will defend it. Continued weakness could bring the 200-day SMA near $73K into focus. Holding recent lows and recovering around $82K would challenge that view.

Weekly candles are shown with daily SMAs; the latest candle is unfinished. The band uses a 20-week SMA and 21-week EMA.

The Fed decision is Wednesday, then PCE inflation and the first Q3 GDP estimate arrive Thursday.

What price behaviour would make you treat the band as meaningful support?

The ETH/BTC chart asks a different question from a dollar chart: how much Bitcoin does one ETH buy?

A rising ratio means ETH is outperforming BTC over that interval. A falling ratio means it is underperforming. That’s price performance, not a full measure of quality or total return.

I use BTC-relative performance as one part of my altcoin filter, alongside real revenue and how the token benefits. No single chart settles the investment case.

When you judge an altcoin, what would make Bitcoin the wrong benchmark?

At the right edge, estimated Bitcoin hash rate rises while price does not follow the same path.

Blue is hash rate; black is Bitcoin’s dollar price. They use different axes, so matching heights have no meaning.

My interpretation: more computing power is network evidence, not automatically evidence of stronger investment returns.

Uncertainty: daily hash-rate estimates are noisy because block discovery is random. The provider recommends a seven-day average; this view uses daily readings.

What would you need to see before treating sustained hash-rate growth as evidence for a stronger investment case?